Enter Your Zip Code to Connect with a Lawyer Serving Your Area
Given that the difference between a .07% and .08% blood alcohol content reading can mean the difference between a criminal conviction and numerous administrative issues or none at all, persons facing charges based on borderline BAC results resulting arrest should earnestly attempt to contest the validity and accuracy of the blood alcohol content testing. While logical, the reality is that any serious attempt to contest the validity or accuracy of a blood alcohol testing device, method, or result will require a DUI lawyer to make the appropriate arrangements. These arrangements will include making discovery requests about a given arrest, including the method and specific device used to ascertain a driver’s BAC, as well as making other inquiries about the calibration, settings, and maintenance of the DUI testing equipment. This process, which may delve into rather complex forensic and scientific issues such as retrograde extrapolation, partition ratio disputes, challenging the equilibrium of alcohol presence versus absorption, and others, may also require the expert testimony and investigation of a forensic expert.
In practice, the actually method of defending a borderline DUI offense will require pre-determined information about the actual arrest itself, specifically the testing equipment used and timeline of the arrest, to make competent defense arguments about the accuracy of the blood, urine, or breath test results. However, in general, legal counsel will employ the following thought process when attempting to defend against a borderline BAC DUI charge:
In essence, the only effective method of disputing a DUI charge will be through the insight, investigative skills, and representation of a DUI lawyer in the jurisdiction where your arrest occurred. Consult with a DUI lawyer as soon as feasibly possible following being detained under the suspicion of driving under the influence.